🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.